1 changed files with 12 additions and 25 deletions
@ -1,32 +1,19 @@
|
||||
punk tcl runtimes for various platforms |
||||
These are 'Batteries Included' Tcl interpreters |
||||
ie - They contain various binary Tcl extensions |
||||
so these runtimes are considerably larger than a minimal tclkit. |
||||
|
||||
punk tcl runtimes all include Tk as a loadable extension |
||||
These are self contained Tcl interpreters that have a few necessary extensions, but can be used as the basis to build tclkit or zipfs based 'kits' that contain other extensions, including those that contain loadable binary modules. |
||||
|
||||
punk tcl runtimes can all load Tk as a loadable extension |
||||
- there is no separate Tk runtime |
||||
|
||||
Packages include: |
||||
critcl |
||||
dde |
||||
Ffidl |
||||
iocp |
||||
Memchan |
||||
reg |
||||
sqlite3 |
||||
tcllib |
||||
tcllibc |
||||
tcltls |
||||
tdbc |
||||
tdbcmysql |
||||
tdbcodbc |
||||
tdbcpostgres |
||||
tdom |
||||
thread |
||||
Trf |
||||
udp |
||||
vfs |
||||
vqtcl |
||||
The recommended current runtime for Windows is tclsh902z.exe |
||||
as it has tcllibc built in, which can dramatically improve performance in some situations. |
||||
|
||||
In general, the startup, interp creation and library loading performance is better on zipfs based runtimes than those built on tclkit. |
||||
|
||||
Platforms: |
||||
win64 |
||||
|
||||
FreeBSD,Linux,Macosx to come. |
||||
The punk kit constructing infrastructure is intended to be cross-platform, and has been minimally tested on Linux & Freebsd. |
||||
It currently requires static tclsh with zipfs or tclkitsh binaries to be manually sourced for non-windows platforms. |
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in new issue